This post contains affiliate links.
On The Table Read Magazine, “the best arts and entertainment magazine UK“, in The Duchy of Cornwall: Still Beyond the Law?, author Peter Stuart Smith and constitutional expert Dr. John Kirkhope deliver an explosive investigation into the 700-year history, hidden sovereignty, and controversial legal exemptions of the royal estate.
The British constitution is often praised for its stability, but a groundbreaking new book suggests that one of its oldest institutions operates in a legal gray area completely hidden from public view.
In The Duchy of Cornwall: Still Beyond the Law?, authors Peter Stuart Smith and Dr. John Kirkhope deliver a searing, 300-page exposé on the secret history and modern influence of the Duchy of Cornwall. Combining years of rigorous archival research with constitutional expertise, the book challenges everything the public thinks it knows about the relationship between Cornwall, the British Crown, and the Westminster government.



A Suppressed History and Claims of Sovereignty
The core argument of the investigation is a radical departure from conventional British geography and history: Cornwall, the authors assert, has never legally been a part of England or the United Kingdom.
According to the research, Cornwall’s status as a separate sovereign nation was established by royal charter on March 17, 1337. Because this charter was never legally rescinded, and its ancient laws predate and take precedence over British law, the authors argue that these rights remain fully intact.
Historically, this separate identity was met with severe state suppression. The book details a dark period in the mid-16th century when the English government attempted to eliminate the Cornish language and culture, resulting in a brutal campaign that cost the lives of roughly 20% of the Cornish population. Today, organizations like English Heritage are accused of overlooking these historical massacres to maintain a more palatable national narrative.
Ancient Rights in the Modern Era
According to the book’s findings, Westminster continues to ignore several inconvenient but unrepealed legal realities regarding Cornwall’s autonomy. Legally, Cornwall retains the right to:
- Issue and utilize its own independent currency.
- Raise a localized militia when necessary.
- Convene its own Stannary Parliament.
Crucially, the authors note that through this Stannary Parliament, the Cornish people technically possess the inalienable right to veto and reject any legislation passed by the United Kingdom parliament.
Secretive Finances and Parliamentary Vetoes
Moving from ancient history to modern operations, the book portrays the Duchy of Cornwall as an autocratic, highly secretive organization that frequently shifts its legal status to secure the most advantageous tax positions.
The investigation highlights several controversial practices tied to the institution and its leadership, particularly during King Charles III’s long tenure as the Duke of Cornwall:
- Property Anomalies: The authors state that the Duchy has no verifiable legal claim to ownership over the Scilly Isles. Additionally, it has successfully lobbied to alter UK property laws in ways that disadvantage its own tenants.
- Financial Oddities: In a bizarre circular financial arrangement, the former Duke of Cornwall paid rent to himself for his use of Highgrove House, ultimately receiving a higher net financial return than the rent he put in.
- The Royal Veto: Unlike ordinary citizens, both the Monarch and the Duke of Cornwall hold the unique, absolute power to review and veto specific pieces of legislation before they can even be voted on at Westminster.
Furthermore, the book alleges a systemic lack of political honesty regarding these matters, claiming that Westminster routinely dismisses inquiries from the Cornish people while substantial funds meant to safeguard Cornish culture have been redirected into completely unrelated sectors.

Challenging Equality Before the Law
Ultimately, the most alarming conclusion of The Duchy of Cornwall: Still Beyond the Law? is that the foundational principle of Western justice—that everyone is equal under the law—simply does not apply to the Duke of Cornwall or his estate. While the Duchy of Lancaster has faced various levels of public scrutiny, the Duchy of Cornwall has successfully avoided deep investigation for nearly seven centuries, accumulating anachronistic privileges along the way.
The credentials of the authors lend significant weight to these claims. Peter Stuart Smith is a highly prolific author and former Royal Navy pilot, while Dr. John Kirkhope is widely regarded as the UK’s leading legal expert on the Duchy. Dr. Kirkhope’s extensive background in constitutional law and his success in forcing the Cabinet Office to release documents via Freedom of Information acts—which triggered two House of Commons Select Committee inquiries—prove he is no stranger to challenging the establishment.
For anyone interested in the inner workings of British society, constitutional loopholes, or the hidden history of the British Isles, this meticulous investigation reveals a shadow system of power that demands a public response.
Find more from Peter Stuart Smith and Dr. John Kirkhope now:
Kindle: https://amzn.to/4utrDmx
Paperback: https://amzn.to/3RDrTl7
We strive to keep The Table Read free for both our readers and our contributors. If you have enjoyed our work, please consider donating to help keep The Table Read going!
